Is Agile Government an Oxymoron?

By Dick Stark

The needle has hardly moved since the COBOL days. Projects are taking longer, have less success, over-run to a greater extent. Meanwhile citizens are ill served. What is needed is not making things more agile, but simplifying the whole ponderous, error prone process where a majority of stakeholders consistently favor more process complexity, slower speed in the name of quality, and never penalize the wizards who preside over this domain.

      –Reader comment in response to Steve Kelman’s FCW article, “What’s happening in agile,” March 15, 2016.

Kanbahn Chart

Is agile Government an oxymoron? The above reader certainly thinks so. Although I don’t have specific data that shows the Government is any worse than the private sector, several failed or poor projects come to mind: Lockheed’s botched $170M 2001 FBI modernization project, and CGI’s removal from its $678M 2013 Obamacare website contract. The failed FBI project is often cited as a case study for agile development over the traditional waterfall approach. It’s more difficult, however, to pinpoint blame with the CGI project. Most reports examine CGI’s difficult task of integrating its back-end development efforts with another vendor’s front-end software interface. Without a good way of testing software end-to-end, software debugging is more challenging and time consuming. With tight project release deadlines looming, inadequate software testing resulted in software that was released too early.

According to Steve Kelman’s recent article, the Government is making significant progress in in agile software development processes. Kelman specifically referenced the work of Mark Schwartz, CIO at US Citizen and Immigration services (USCIS), one of the leaders in the government’s move towards agile. Specifically, Schwartz is a proponent of continuous delivery as a way to shorten the software development life cycle by automating the delivery process (think Atlassian toolset) and making software releases smaller and more frequent (think Amazon). Smaller faster releases enable users to quickly test, and the developers to quickly fix any issues. The larger and more complex the release, the more likely that multiple and more complex defects will be discovered.

Schwartz says that his plan for USCIS is to go 100% agile “cold turkey.” This means that all his new IT projects will offer continuous releases. This requires automation and effective control processes to roll-back to a previous version if necessary.

Think of the implications for our work with large ITSM deployment projects. For example, rather than have a Phase 1 delivery stretching over six to nine months and promising integrated incident, problem, change, and asset management, why not do incident in three weeks, followed by change management three weeks after that? Of course, some of these modules are closely integrated meaning that care must be taken to separate each release.

In a new DOD agile ITSM Remedy project just underway, RightStar is using Agile / Scrum tools to meet the tight timeframes imposed by the customer. In addition to compiling an expert deployment team, RightStar is utilizing excellent DevOps practices for success such as collaboration, project transparency, better workflow, and improved communication. The overriding objective: meet the customer’s tight timeframes and show that both rapid Remedy deployments and agile government development projects are definitely NOT oxymoron’s.

Advertisements

About dick1stark

I am the President, CEO, and founder of RightStar Systems, a leading IT consultancy and BMC Software Solution Provider and Atlassian Expert Partner. My passion is customer success—whether it’s reducing the cost of service management, improving overall efficiency, or increasing end-user or employee satisfaction. Since founding RightStar in 2003, RightStar has made the INC 5000 list four times. In 2011, RightStar was awarded the prestigious National Capital Business Ethics Award (NCBEA) by the Society of Financial Service Professionals based upon RightStar’s foundation of honesty, ethics, and integrity. And in 2014, RightStar was selected by Forrester Research as one of 13 North American companies profiled in its ITSM Consultancy Wave Report. Finally, in 2016, BMC selected RightStar as its 2015 Supplier of the Year for its consulting partnership and excellence in service delivery. Dick is a graduate of Stanford University and a Project Management Professional (PMP).
This entry was posted in DevOps, ITSM, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s